Companies, hospitals, public institutions, universities, etc, deserve a better cloud environment.

“One of the cloud major promises is transparency and simplicity. Budgeting is said to be easy. However, the reality is quite different.”
Bernard Duverneuil, Vice-President of Cigref in charge of European Affairs

 

Read about this same topic in the Dutch and French press releases.

A non-competitive environment requires fair principles

The cloud market is characterized by several features that are unfavorable to business users:

1. Once software is implemented, it is strongly entwined with the business processes. There is a vendor lock in: it is so complex and costly to switch to another provider that organisations are often stuck with their supplier.
2. Business users do not have bargaining power vis-à-vis the large software suppliers.
3. Cloud providers can unilaterally change subscription prices and the metrics on which the prices are based. How can organisations build a business case if they cannot predict future costs?
   

   “A company using ticket machines paid a fixed price/month/machine for the software. After some time, the software vendor changed the model to subscriptions based on the number of people using the machines. Not only did the vendor’s decision completely change the business case, it was also very complex for the company to get organised, as the machines are being used in different application environments.”
   Hans-Joachim Popp, Deputy chairman of VOICE

4. This is not only true for large software and cloud providers, but also for niche players.
5. There is market concentration and dominance by a couple of large players, for a significant part of the cloud business market. Strong software providers copy features from smaller competitors and integrate them in their software. This both reduces competition and customers’ choices, and thus increases their dependence.
   

   “When considering a provider, prices are dropped and features are promised. After signing, hidden costs emerge and features do not come as promised”
   Martijn Koning, President of CIO Platform Nederland

6. There is a tendency to combine vertical offerings. Software providers can limit the choice of infrastructure which business customers are entitled to use to run their cloud applications.
7. The costs and complexity to get your data back from the provider at the end of the contract, can be very unreasonable.
   

   “The cloud market is very heterogeneous. We aren’t targeting specific cloud providers. The fair principles described should be respected by all cloud suppliers.”
   Claude Rapoport, President of Beltug

NOW is the time to act

The upcoming Digital Markets Act, Artificial Intelligence Act and Data Act, as well as the EU cloud rulebook and standard contractual clauses, offer several opportunities to improve the situation.

We call on the European Commission, the European Parliament, national governments, and European and national regulatory and competition authorities to secure the future of the cloud in Europe. European organizations rely on cloud providers to achieve their digital transformation and deliver their services: it is critical that these cloud providers respect the rules of a fair trade and healthy competition in the European market, so that all players can benefit from the opportunities.

We invite all these bodies to:

• stop the abuse of vendor lock-in and unfair practices by cloud providers, and ensure fair market practice in the digital technology markets.
• ensure that control over data remains with business users of digital technologies, without this leading to additional costs or other negative effects.

“Some 30 years ago, the EU broke up the telecom operator monopolies, because Europe saw that competition in the telecom market would create many opportunities. Now, companies face a lock-in at a much higher level on the cloud services market.”
Bernard Duverneuil, Vice-President of Cigref in charge of European Affairs

11 Fair Principles

1. Vendors shall fulfil existing regulatory obligations. Read more…
2. Vendors shall not create any technical or commercial lock-in. Read more…
3. Customers shall remain in control of their own data and of all the data uploaded or processed by the service/solution. Read more…
4. Contractual terms and conditions shall be clear and unambiguous. They shall not be unilaterally changeable. Read more…
5. Contractual terms shall not restrict or discriminate for customers’ choice of cloud provider, outsourcing partner or hardware platform. Read more…
6. Contractual terms for licensing and subscriptions shall be free from geographic and entity restrictions. Read more…
7. Contractual terms shall allow customers to use progressive or innovative technologies and deployment models. Read more…
8. Service levels and product specifications shall be explicitly listed, and take into account the context of the customer. Read more…
9. Commercial models shall not be changed unilaterally, and shall adhere to an active ‘opt-in’ principle. Read more…
10. Commercial models and offerings shall be consistent and reasonable, and shall not combine different models for the benefit of the vendor’s revenue. Read more…
11. The scope, execution and intended outcome of an audit shall be clearly defined in the contract. Read more…

_______________________________

Joint message and call to action

This position and call to action is a joint message from the Belgian, Dutch, French and German CIO associations; communities of Chief Information Officers (CIOs) and other senior leaders who are responsible for digital technologies and digital transformations within private or public organisations. These are all business users of digital technologies. They do not represent ICT suppliers and consultants.

• Cigref – France
• VOICE – Germany
• CIO Platform Nederland – The Netherlands
• Beltug – Belgium